This is a long delayed ink up, in my defense i had to deplete some other pens first.
Sunday, January 7, 2018
Monday, December 11, 2017
Con-40 partial disassembly.
To
those who hated that con40's stupid design of gate and the rattling
ball bearing like me, u can remove them. Yes you can. And use it like a
con50. Clean it easily like a con50. If ink gets behind the converter,
do know that there is a hole behind and that allows you to flush water
in to clean it.
to remove the metal gate : get a pincer, 2 legs in. turn, wiggle, and it's loose.
to remove the metal gate : get a pincer, 2 legs in. turn, wiggle, and it's loose.
Sunday, November 5, 2017
派利003 compared to prera. size difference, body not interchangeable. Personally Prera is still better in terms of the feel, as the length is just right. oh, 003 is back heavy when posted, unlike prera which is still balanced. however, the talk of the town. however, 003 may be preferred for those with bigger hands.
body built is quite steady, plastic is quite thick and not weak. smoothness well, you can swap with a pilot pen, or some tuning is required. not too much.
Sunday, October 15, 2017
The "wicked" system
My usual style is to release version 1 once version 3 is made and stabilized, so here goes...version 1.
Personally, i do not consider a fountain pen that uses a wick in its feed to be a fountain pen, because, well, that is cheating. and for a long time i refused to look at its merits.
until now (or then since i'm already on version 3).
so, if a wick can work, why then shouldn't we extend the wick to be....the reservoir too?
why not?
why yes? well there are these advantages:
1) a full wick system means there is no air in the reservoir, which means no sudden air expansion which causes leak.
2) with no reservoir, there is no chance of ink leaks as the ink is held in the wick.
3) the ink flow is very controlled. seriously, it's writing dry, not like the usual wick feed which are usually wet
4) the wick reservoir looks nice
5) it is easily refillable
6) it is easily washable (the wick, that is). i think. i mean, easy is relative.
materials are simple:
1) a wick FP. the daiso pen, the pilot petit1, the zebra pen or any pen you see with a white thing in the middle, that is a wick pen.
2) a highlighter pen that does not use ink, but a sponge inside. remove that, wash it clean till it is white, and you are good to go.
anyway, here goes. the first full wick pen. For the lack of a better name, i call this the "wicked system"
Personally, i do not consider a fountain pen that uses a wick in its feed to be a fountain pen, because, well, that is cheating. and for a long time i refused to look at its merits.
until now (or then since i'm already on version 3).
so, if a wick can work, why then shouldn't we extend the wick to be....the reservoir too?
why not?
why yes? well there are these advantages:
1) a full wick system means there is no air in the reservoir, which means no sudden air expansion which causes leak.
2) with no reservoir, there is no chance of ink leaks as the ink is held in the wick.
3) the ink flow is very controlled. seriously, it's writing dry, not like the usual wick feed which are usually wet
4) the wick reservoir looks nice
5) it is easily refillable
6) it is easily washable (the wick, that is). i think. i mean, easy is relative.
materials are simple:
1) a wick FP. the daiso pen, the pilot petit1, the zebra pen or any pen you see with a white thing in the middle, that is a wick pen.
2) a highlighter pen that does not use ink, but a sponge inside. remove that, wash it clean till it is white, and you are good to go.
anyway, here goes. the first full wick pen. For the lack of a better name, i call this the "wicked system"
Friday, September 8, 2017
Friday, July 7, 2017
Sheaffer converter
For those who are interested in a full breakdown of a sheaffer converter. I had to do this to repair the faulty converter.
Wednesday, May 10, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)